Characteristics of endometrial receptivity in women with different endometrial thickness

نویسندگان

چکیده

Aim: to evaluate the expression of estrogen (ER) and progesterone (PR) receptors in endometrium during "implantation window" women with a history reproductive dysfunction different endometrial thickness. Materials Methods. A prospective single-center cohort comparative study was conducted. The main group included patients hypoplastic (< 7 mm according ultrasound data on preovulatory days) (n = 52), comparison consisted normal thickness 62) (women both groups dysfunctions unclear cause), control 16 healthy fertile women. An aspiration biopsy performed day 6–8 after ovulation simultaneous collection peripheral blood sample measure level estradiol (P). Endometrial biopsies were examined histological immunohistochemical (expression ER, PR) methods. Results. All had an ovulatory cycle, serum ≥ 16.1 nmol/L (6–8 days ovulation) normoestrogenemia. E2/P similar all cohorts (p > 0.05). Indicators PR, 16), found 21 % 11 out 52) 32 20 from groups, respectively. remaining 79 41 "thin" (main group) 68 42 (comparison ER PR indices glands stroma significant differences < 0.05) parameters (excepting stroma) those (control group), but without relevant between these regardless Conclusion. In disorders, problems, noted mm) by 50 less often than uterine mucosa. At same time, is not absolute predictor disorders hormone-receptor characteristics endometrium: every fifth case, magnitude determined.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Endometrial beta3 Integrin profile reflects endometrial receptivity defects in women with unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss

BACKGROUND The pathophysiology of recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is still unknown in 50% of the cases. Herein we measure the expression of beta3 integrin subunit, a well-known implantation marker, in women with or without RPL and correlate it with the histological dating of the endometrial tissue. METHODS LH-timed endometrial biopsies were obtained from cases (RPL; n = 21, age 33.9+/-4.7) and...

متن کامل

Redefining Endometrial Receptivity

However, the notion of receptivity as a static state in which the tissue is poised, frozen in time, awaiting the arrival of an adequately developed embryo, is naïve. An integrative definition of receptivity must embrace communication between maternal and embryonic tissues. At receptivity, the endometrium has reached a point at which negotiation can begin that may or may not lead to successful i...

متن کامل

I-38: Effect of Ovarian Stimulation on Endometrial Receptivity

Lee CKF Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, The university of Hong Kong, China Email: [email protected]

متن کامل

Factors Influencing Endometrial Thickness in Postmenopausal Women

BACKGROUND Cut-off values for endometrial thickness (ET) in asymptomatic postmenopausal woman have been standardized. However, there are no comprehensive studies to document how various factors can influence the ET after the age of menopause. AIM To study the various factors influencing the ET in postmenopausal women. SUBJECTS AND METHODS This was a prospective observational study. A total ...

متن کامل

the predictive value of endometrial thickness in endometrial pathologies in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding

abstract background: abnormal uterine bleeding (aub) is one of the most common complains in women of any age seeking gynecologic health care and needs early diagnosis and proper management due to its impacts on the quality of life. this study was conducted to investigate the cut-off value of endometrial thickness (et) by trans-vaginal ultra-sonography (tvus) and evaluate its accuracy in the dia...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['2313-7347', '2500-3194']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2022.303